|
Message-ID: <20110424184701.GC2202@openwall.com> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:47:01 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: new soft: conntrack, ucarp On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:16:26PM +0300, Georgi Geshev wrote: > In my humble opinion, this is an appropriate (enough) suggestion, especially > concerning the conntrack-tools. Would you use/test them, if we have them in Owl? And not just for the sake of testing, but because of real need for something like this. > Let me know if I should / may prepare the RPM package builds or it is > actually preferable that some code review is done first. I'd prefer that you provide a status update on your current task first (gcc update), in the proper thread. Once you do, we might ask you to work on this if you like. :-) Thank you for offering help! Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.