[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110325070830.GB14676@gremlin.ru>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:08:30 +0300
From: gremlin@...mlin.ru
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: absolute symlinks
On 24-Mar-2011 22:30:02 +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > Link Points to Should point to
> Do you have use cases where these differences result in some error?
> They are not obvious for me. There would be a difference in case of
> a chroot filesystem, but I cannot see how these files can be located
> inside of chroot.
No errors, but they are very annoying when making the live flash - it
still requires some handwork.
And, of course, absolute links theirself are mauvais tone...
> > /dev/fd /proc/self/fd ../proc/self/fd
> > /dev/core /proc/kcore ../proc/kcore
> On Ubuntu these links are absolute.
Do you really think that's a good behavior to follow?
--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
<gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru>
GPG key ID: 0xAB8CF595, keyserver: hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
