|
Message-ID: <20110323165514.GA26658@albatros> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:55:14 +0300 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: iproute2 2.6.38 Solar, all - I'm updating iproute2 to 2.6.38 and picking some patches from ALT Linux. http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/iproute2/patches Patches I want to include: iproute2-2.4.7-alt-rtacct_daemon.diff iproute2-2.6.18-alt-ifcfg.diff iproute2-2.6.18-alt-ip-man.diff iproute2-2.6.28-alt-format_not_a_string_literal_and_no_format_arguments.diff I'm not sure about the patch iproute2-2.6.35-fixrouteget.patch: http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/iproute2/patches https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23872 I cannot reproduce the bug with these steps; also I'm not sure about the fix itself - filter.cloned is set to 2 in iproute_get() and results of all boolean expressions are well defined, e.g. !0 == 1 and !!15 == 1, so maybe authors of the code might want to compare 2 and 0 or 2 and 1. I didn't try to understand ip's logic, but the patch itself looks suspicious to me. The same with iproute2-2.6.25-segfault.patch: http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/iproute2/patches/2 https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15409 I cannot reproduce the segfault and IMO the patch makes no sense - it is a plain copy-paste from strncpy's manpage. I don't want to include them unless someone is able to reproduce these bugs. About packetizing new executables: I don't know what it is, it has no documentation: /sbin/genl These are 2 bash script wrappers of ip: /sbin/routef /sbin/routel And I suppose we still don't want to packetize arpd, right? About documentation: %doc RELNOTES examples %doc README.distribution README.iproute2+tc README.lnstat Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.