Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110306121807.GA836@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:18:07 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [bugzilla-daemon@...nvz.org: [Bug 1801] VDSO: Not enough room for program headers]

On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 03:05:08PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 14:55 +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> > (e.g., Pavel changes his mind and takes care of the issue for
> > us, but this is unlikely because he won't even be able to get to that
> > point in the compile without our existing patches...
> 
> Actually, he's able - the build process fails with an official OpenVZ
> config and OpenVZ -combined patch, no -owl.

(I assume, you mean it fails in the way you described on the "bug".)

Oh, that's good to know.  Since we're patching several compile issues,
I assumed that the build would likely fail on another issue first.  But
we're lucky, it seems.

> As to Owl-3.0 - it's unlikely they change anything in current rhel5-stable
> branch.  The build failure was triggered by changes in -testing.  So, we
> have some time to investigate the failure until 028stab085.1 gains
> "stable" status.

Right.  We might have a bit of time.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.