|
|
Message-Id: <65da8b9c-7f35-41ef-8927-4dd19a05e07e@app.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 21:45:03 +0100 From: "Imre Kaloz" <kaloz@...nel.org> To: "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] add SYSCALL_RT_SIGACTION_RESTORER hook for sparc Hi Rich, On Wed, Nov 4, 2026, at 17:27, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote: <snip> >> Thanks, the inline function is much cleaner. The 32-bit one needs >> struct k_sigaction and SA_SIGINFO, so in v2 it would live in >> arch/sparc/ksigaction.h, whose users include signal.h first; _NSIG is >> visible there. syscall_arch.h would only have > > Hmm, putting the inline function in ksigaction.h? Kinda ugly but it > might work to avoid pulling in unwanted headers all over. Agreed, it's not pretty. It was the least invasive place I found, but if you have a better idea I'm happy to go with it. Is there anything else you'd like to see changed in v2? Thanks, Imre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.