|
|
Message-ID: <20260923142601.GW23438@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:26:02 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Pablo Correa Gomez <pabloyoyoista@...tmarketos.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Default path search for locale - request for comments On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 10:17:08AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 04:04:01PM +0200, Pablo Correa Gomez wrote: > > Hi Rich, > > > > It seems we just talked over each other in 2 different threads > > > > El Wed, 23-09-2026 a las 09:40 -0400, Rich Felker escribió: > > > One goal for the outcome of the locale overhaul making locales > > > actually usable was to get rid of the requirement of having the > > > MUSL_LOCPATH environment variable set to enable loading, which does > > > not work with suid binaries and precluded any support for running them > > > in anything but C/C.UTF-8 locale. It was also an impediment even to > > > non-suid use, since users in an environment-scrubbed setting might > > > find LC_* variables suddenly not working for them. > > > > > > So, we need to pick a default search path. > > > > > > Overriding the path will still be an option but limited to the > > > libc.secure==0 case (i.e. unavailable to suid binaries) as it is now. > > > We may pick a different name for the override variable just to avoid > > > clashing with names anyone using the old locale framework with old > > > binaries might be using. > > > > > > I know this is very much a bikeshed topic, so I am laying out some > > > contraints below for properties a default path needs to satisfy and > > > going over some things that have already been proposed on IRC and > > > other channels, grouped by whether they are rejected (with reasons) or > > > under consideration. Please read and be aware of these if you want to > > > participate in the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Design constraints for a default path: > > > > > > - It should not be dependent on configure-time --prefix. Having it > > > depend on prefix would make it so static binaries built from a > > > toolchain installed in a nonstandard prefix, or on a distro that > > > uses an unusual prefix, fail to find locales when run on a standard > > > musl-based system. > > > > > > - It cannot search locations that are expected to be writable by > > > (non-root) users. > > > > > > - It should avoid imposing new rules on filesystem layout beyond > > > assumptions we already make on absolute paths. > > > > > > - It should be configurable by the administrator without the need to > > > modify a filesystem that's allowed to be read-only. > > > > > > > > > Based on these constaints, the proposal I've made on IRC is that the > > > default path be something under /etc. This is *not* a place you are > > > expected to store the actual installed locale files (doing so would > > > violate FHS); rather, the expectation is that it would be a symlink > > > allowing administrators and integrators to configure where they have > > > locales installed to avoid hard-coding any expectation of where the > > > distro puts things and to allow an administrator to opt out of using > > > the distro-provided files and instead use their own build (where they > > > may have different opinions about what cultural conventions their > > > locales should reflect). > > > > I really dislike the idea to hard-code something that is not standards- > > compliant, as anybody following a standard would have to violate it (place a > > system-symlink under /etc) just to make it compliant. > > I don't understand what you think is not standards-compliant here. We > are talking about storing in /etc a configuration for where to look > for a particular resource. As I see it this is very much the same > thing as having the system-wide library search path stored in > /etc/ld-musl-$ARCH.path, having the DNS stored in /etc/resolv.conf, > and so on. > > Can you clarify what you think is nonconforming here? My best guess is > that you misunderstood it as actually storing installed locale files > there (which would very much be a bad thing, and non-conforming), but > if that's not the case I'd like to know so we can figure this out. I didn't see you'd replied to the other thread when I wrote this. I'll take a look and see if that answers my questions and follow up here. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.