[<prev] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-5f4Xb_8SJv7FtV@pie.lan>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:16:01 +0000
From: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Xing Li <lixing@...ngson.cn>
Cc: wanghongliang@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch64: add bits/hwcap.h
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 07:50:49PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 03:26:42PM +0800, Xing Li wrote:
> > loongarch64 have cpu feature bits defined in linux
> > for AT_HWCAP auxv entry.
> > ---
> > arch/loongarch64/bits/hwcap.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/loongarch64/bits/hwcap.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch64/bits/hwcap.h b/arch/loongarch64/bits/hwcap.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..355beda7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch64/bits/hwcap.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> > +/* The following must match the kernel's <asm/hwcap.h>. */
> > +/* HWCAP flags */
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_CPUCFG (1 << 0)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LAM (1 << 1)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_UAL (1 << 2)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_FPU (1 << 3)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LSX (1 << 4)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LASX (1 << 5)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_CRC32 (1 << 6)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_COMPLEX (1 << 7)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_CRYPTO (1 << 8)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LVZ (1 << 9)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LBT_X86 (1 << 10)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LBT_ARM (1 << 11)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_LBT_MIPS (1 << 12)
> > +#define HWCAP_LOONGARCH_PTW (1 << 13)
> > --
> > 2.27.0
>
> Thanks, applying.
I didn't find this patch in our public git repository, is there any
reason or am I coming to the wrong place?
Thanks,
Yao Zi
[1]: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
