[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <017819f1-18b5-2350-5d9a-661ee9b40d2d@mirbsd.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 21:10:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: f128 aliases for long double math symbols
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025, Rich Felker wrote:
>Not if they're implemented with code at the same address. If they're
>the *same function*.
But they *are*!
I don’t see anything saying that, if I use the memmove implementation
for memcpy, they cannot be aliased to the same function pointer. (At
least in C99, haven’t looked at C23.)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
