[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250226084210.3c84753c.quinq@fifth.space>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:42:10 +0100
From: Quentin Rameau <quinq@...th.space>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resolvconf: Set minimum timeout value to 1
Hi,
> /etc/resolv.conf has an option to configure the timeout, in seconds,
> that the DNS resolution must wait before considering that resolution to
> have failed. While there is no documentation about what happens when
> that value contains a 0 or negative value, some machines appear to have
> it configured this way.
The question is what was the user intent when setting timeout to 0
or a negative value.
Surely that wouldn't be having a timeout of 1,
because they would have put a timeout of 1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
