[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241207050457.GQ10433@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 00:04:58 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@...xrp.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clone: clear the frame pointer in the child
process on relevant ports
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 07:48:53PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> This just mirrors what is done in the start code for the affected ports, as well
> as what is already done for the three x86 ports. For consistency, I also changed
> the x86 ports and the powerpc port to have the child process portion at the end
> of clone().
Can you submit without this independent change? Readers of history
should be able to confirm that the patch does not make any other
functional change, and it's hard to do that when reorganizing code is
mixed with the change.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
