[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=Ajk+S1nDXhnh1B9c3eotdwqLKVR1yL_7Hww6oA=YYYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:35:06 -0500
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: sgetspent(3) on musl
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 1:12 AM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> [...]
> FWIW though I don't generally expect spurious declarations like this
> to do any harm -- detection should be via a compile-and-link test not
> just looking for a declaration. Is there a build system these days
> that's doing purely declaration-based detection?
I don't know about build systems, but I generally avoid build systems
for my projects. I would not wish Autotools on an enemy.
Instead I use a non-anemic make, like GNU Make. GNU Make is all that
is needed to test header files for #defines.
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
