[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88f3122170794590afdbeb4d86d394f9@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 04:39:59 +0000
From: "Gardner, Ryan P" <ryan.p.gardner@...ing.com>
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 libc-test] functional:time:clock_nanosleep test
Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> writes:
> thanks
> patches look good. but it will take a week or two
> for me to be able to test and apply them.
Thank you for the quick response. We appreciate your timeline for testing and applying the patches.
Our plan is to submit tests for the majority of functions that currently lack coverage within libc-test.
We already have a significant number of tests written and ready for submission. To avoid overwhelming
you with patches, do you have a preferred cadence for the submission of these tests?
Additionally, we are planning to setup runtime tests in collaboration with the Buildroot community. This
would facilitate testing across various embedded configurations and processor architectures. Once up
and running, when we submit new test patches we can reference a fork of Buildroot that shows the tests
passing on various hardware configurations.
Looking forward to your guidance,
Ryan Gardner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
