[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2406260146510.5989@herc.mirbsd.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: roundf() (and round(), and ...)
enh dixit:
>bionic actually uses __builtin_fabs() [and friends] to _implement_
>these functions, should someone be foolish enough to be using a
That’ll be fun should the compiler decide to insert a call to
fabs() at the call site instead, which it’d be allowed to do ☺
Stories of compilers doing that abound… IIRC it was the compiler
recognising the implementation pattern of memcpy and replacing
that by a call to memcpy… in some libc’s that was not careful to
use -ffreestanding memcpy implementation.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
