[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2b46da4c-fbe8-4b97-abf4-96aa7ddc1a9a@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:49:20 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org>, "Andreas Larsson" <andreas@...sler.com>,
guoren <guoren@...nel.org>,
"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
"Helge Deller" <deller@....de>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"LTP List" <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, "Brian Cain" <bcain@...cinc.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"Xi Ruoyao" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] sh: rework sync_file_range ABI
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 08:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> > Did you also check what order libc uses? I would expect libc on SuperH
>> > misordering the
>> > arguments as well unless I am missing something. Or do we know that the
>> > code is actually
>> > currently broken?
>>
>> Yes, I checked glibc, musl and uclibc-ng for all the cases in
>> which the ABI made no sense, as well as to check that my analysis
>> of the kernel sources matches the expectations of the libc.
>
> OK, awesome.
>
> Will you send a v2 so I can ack the updated version of the patch?
>
> I'm also fine with the patch going through your tree, as I would
> like to start with the changes for v6.11 this week.
I should be able to get a v2 out today and apply that to my
asm-generic tree to have in linux-next before I send the
pull request.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
