![]() |
|
Message-Id: <2b46da4c-fbe8-4b97-abf4-96aa7ddc1a9a@app.fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:49:20 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org>, "Andreas Larsson" <andreas@...sler.com>, guoren <guoren@...nel.org>, "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, "Helge Deller" <deller@....de>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>, "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>, "Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "LTP List" <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, "Brian Cain" <bcain@...cinc.com>, "Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "Xi Ruoyao" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] sh: rework sync_file_range ABI On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 08:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> > Did you also check what order libc uses? I would expect libc on SuperH >> > misordering the >> > arguments as well unless I am missing something. Or do we know that the >> > code is actually >> > currently broken? >> >> Yes, I checked glibc, musl and uclibc-ng for all the cases in >> which the ABI made no sense, as well as to check that my analysis >> of the kernel sources matches the expectations of the libc. > > OK, awesome. > > Will you send a v2 so I can ack the updated version of the patch? > > I'm also fine with the patch going through your tree, as I would > like to start with the changes for v6.11 this week. I should be able to get a v2 out today and apply that to my asm-generic tree to have in linux-next before I send the pull request. Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.