Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2405012357140.17819@herc.mirbsd.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 23:57:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Leah Neukirchen <leah@...u.org>,
        libc-alpha@...rceware.org, Richard Russon <rich@...tcap.org>
Subject: Re: gcvt(3) should be MT-Safe, AS-Safe, AC-Safe

Alejandro Colomar dixit:

>The BSDs don't seem to document it as being AS-safe either.  NetBSD
>mentions the existence of snprintf_ss(3), but nothing about dprintf(3).
>FreeBSD is silent.  OpenBSD is silent too.

Huh? https://man.openbsd.org/signal.3 not enough?

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :)  -- Ted Unangst über *fs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.