|
Message-ID: <20240416143837.GI4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:38:38 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Viktor Reznov <yann.collet.is.not.a.perfectionist@...il.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Decreasing the number of divisions On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:29:05PM +0300, Viktor Reznov wrote: > diff --git a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > index 497c5e19..0f9a1e6a 100644 > --- a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > +++ b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c > @@ -165,8 +165,10 @@ static char *fmt_o(uintmax_t x, char *s) > static char *fmt_u(uintmax_t x, char *s) > { > unsigned long y; > + if (x == 0) return s; > for ( ; x>ULONG_MAX; x/=10) *--s = '0' + x%10; > - for (y=x; y; y/=10) *--s = '0' + y%10; > + for (y=x; y>=10; y/=10) *--s = '0' + y%10; > + *--s = '0' + y; > return s; > } Seems like a good change. Is there a reason you put the if at the top rather than making the last line the following? if (y) *--s = '0' + y; That would keep the overall flow the same as before and avoid a burden to reason about if/why it's the same. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.