Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240416143837.GI4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:38:38 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Viktor Reznov <yann.collet.is.not.a.perfectionist@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Decreasing the number of divisions

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:29:05PM +0300, Viktor Reznov wrote:
> diff --git a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c
> index 497c5e19..0f9a1e6a 100644
> --- a/src/stdio/vfprintf.c
> +++ b/src/stdio/vfprintf.c
> @@ -165,8 +165,10 @@ static char *fmt_o(uintmax_t x, char *s)
>  static char *fmt_u(uintmax_t x, char *s)
>  {
>         unsigned long y;
> +       if (x == 0) return s;
>         for (   ; x>ULONG_MAX; x/=10) *--s = '0' + x%10;
> -       for (y=x;           y; y/=10) *--s = '0' + y%10;
> +       for (y=x;       y>=10; y/=10) *--s = '0' + y%10;
> +       *--s = '0' + y;
>         return s;
>  }

Seems like a good change. Is there a reason you put the if at the top
rather than making the last line the following?

	if (y) *--s = '0' + y;

That would keep the overall flow the same as before and avoid a burden
to reason about if/why it's the same.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.