|
Message-ID: <20240416134256.GG4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:42:57 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Michael Forney <mforney@...rney.org> Cc: Jens Gustedt <Jens.Gustedt@...ia.fr>, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] C23: update some legacy function pointers On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 08:57:35PM -0700, Michael Forney wrote: > Jens Gustedt <Jens.Gustedt@...ia.fr> wrote: > > In C23, empty parameter lists loose their meaning as "function that > > may receive any number of parameters". > > > > When compiling with -std=c2x, there were three left-overs in musl that > > still used that. Change them to use the correct prototype, since it is > > available at all these places, anyhow. > > I think there's one more: > > diff --git a/src/process/posix_spawn.c b/src/process/posix_spawn.c > index 8294598b..e05f1623 100644 > --- a/src/process/posix_spawn.c > +++ b/src/process/posix_spawn.c > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int child(void *args_vp) > ? &attr->__mask : &args->oldmask, 0); > > int (*exec)(const char *, char *const *, char *const *) = > - attr->__fn ? (int (*)())attr->__fn : execve; > + attr->__fn ? (int (*)(const char *, char *const *, char *const *))attr->__fn : execve; > > exec(args->path, args->argv, args->envp); > ret = -errno; > > Perhaps it's better to solve this by changing the type of __fn in > posix_spawnattr_t from void * to the appropriate function type, but > since this is in a public header, I'm not sure if it somehow breaks > something: > > diff --git a/include/spawn.h b/include/spawn.h > index 8eb73e00..fec1280d 100644 > --- a/include/spawn.h > +++ b/include/spawn.h > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ typedef struct { > pid_t __pgrp; > sigset_t __def, __mask; > int __prio, __pol; > - void *__fn; > + int (*__fn)(const char *, char *const *, char *const *); > char __pad[64-sizeof(void *)]; > } posix_spawnattr_t; > > diff --git a/src/process/posix_spawn.c b/src/process/posix_spawn.c > index 8294598b..2611fb94 100644 > --- a/src/process/posix_spawn.c > +++ b/src/process/posix_spawn.c > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int child(void *args_vp) > ? &attr->__mask : &args->oldmask, 0); > > int (*exec)(const char *, char *const *, char *const *) = > - attr->__fn ? (int (*)())attr->__fn : execve; > + attr->__fn ? attr->__fn : execve; > > exec(args->path, args->argv, args->envp); > ret = -errno; > diff --git a/src/process/posix_spawnp.c b/src/process/posix_spawnp.c > index aad6133b..28ef1aa4 100644 > --- a/src/process/posix_spawnp.c > +++ b/src/process/posix_spawnp.c > @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ int posix_spawnp(pid_t *restrict res, const char *restrict file, > { > posix_spawnattr_t spawnp_attr = { 0 }; > if (attr) spawnp_attr = *attr; > - spawnp_attr.__fn = (void *)__execvpe; > + spawnp_attr.__fn = __execvpe; > return posix_spawn(res, file, fa, &spawnp_attr, argv, envp); > } It's intentional that public headers don't leak implementation internals, so the void * with cast back to function pointer type is preferred. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.