|
Message-ID: <20240412195728.GE4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:57:28 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Peter Ammon <corydoras@...iculousfish.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix printf hex float formatting with precision On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 06:17:25PM -0700, Peter Ammon wrote: > if (p>=0 && p<(LDBL_MANT_DIG-1+3)/4) { > int re = LDBL_MANT_DIG-1-(p*4); > long double round = 1ULL<<re; This expression overflows. re can be as large as 108 but 1ULL has 64-bit type. There's probably some reasonable way to write it that works for reasonable sizes of long double (I think it's safe to assume IEEE quad is the max that will ever be supported), but I presume I wrote it with the original inefficient loop to be fully general to arbitrary precision. It could just be written to use scalbn, I think. At the time I probably was trying to avoid dependency on a libm that could have been separate from libc (bad historical thing). IIRC there was a time when frexp was not used either. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.