|
Message-ID: <20240309202319.GE1884416@port70.net> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:23:19 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> Cc: MUSL <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Re: cacosh.c - Comment needs correction * Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> [2024-03-08 15:44:32 +1100]: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Damian McGuckin wrote: > > > > > The routine produces the correct answer. > > > > However, currently, the comment at the top says > > > > /* acosh(z) = i acos(z) */ > > > > I believe this is technically wrong; > > > > To reflect the code, it should be changed to something like: > > > > /* cacosh(z) = acosh(x +/- i y) = +/- i acos(x + i y) */ > > Sorry (fat fingers or worse): > > /* cacosh(z) = acosh(x +/- i y) = +/- i acos(x +/- i y) */ > according to section 6.2 of https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~smwatt/pub/reprints/2000-sigsam-according.pdf acosh(z) = +-i acos(z) with + when Im(z)>0 or Im(z)==0 && Re(z)<=1 i guess the Im(z)==+0 && Re(z)>1 case is tricky with ieee -0.0 as it depends on if sqrt(-z) is i or -i for z=1, which depends on if pure reals are treated specially sqrt(-1)==i or as sqrt(-1-0i)==-i, in the latter case the current code looks right to me, just the comment wrong. > Thanks - Damian > > Pacific Engineering Systems International ..... 20D Grose St, Glebe NSW 2037 > Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here > Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.