|
Message-ID: <20240301163409.GZ4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:34:09 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Jₑₙₛ Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: adding C23 support On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:46:21PM +0100, Jₑₙₛ Gustedt wrote: > Hello, > as you might have heard, C23 has been finally approved by the C > committee in January 2024 and is now in the loop with ISO to be > published mid-2024. There have been no surprises since the last time > we talked, so all patches that I already proposed some time ago should > still be valid. They can still be found at > > https://forge.icube.unistra.fr/icps/musl/-/branches > > The latest is branch c23-v9 based on today's release of musl, but this > will hopefully be updated when we go along. The patches should be > stacked from the least debated to some which perhaps will never make > it into musl. So if they could be considered bottom-up for inclusion, > that would be great. > > As far as I can see my patches cover most what is needed for C23 > library support, with one noticeable exception which are functions for > <math.h>. These are really too much for me and my level of > expertise. But I have seen that Paul Zimmermann has some of them (the > π functions) in his project, so this could maybe be covered from > there. > > Compilers are now basically there, gcc-14 and clang-18 have most what > is needed for C23 from POV of the language. Great! Thanks for following up. I was just thinking about trying to get C23 additions integrated as a main focus point for the newly started release cycle. I'll take a look at your repo and follow up with comments. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.