[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSM.4.64L.2402071705230.2180@herc.mirbsd.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 17:07:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ldso: continue searching if wrong architecture
is found
enh dixit:
>helpful in catching cases where people had libraries for the wrong
>_architecture_, not just the wrong bitness. "with enough users, all
>errors are common" :-) )
But are these errors?
On Debian, with Multi-Arch and qemu-user and whatnot, that would not
even be unusual, if perhaps not common.
I’m mildly tending towards ignoring objects that are not valid
shared objects of the current architecture and ABI.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Support mksh as /bin/sh and RoQA dash NOW!
‣ src:bash (429 (458) bugs: 0 RC, 295 (315) I&N, 134 (143) M&W, 0 F&P) + 209
‣ src:dash (90 (104) bugs: 0 RC, 51 (54) I&N, 39 (50) M&W, 0 F&P) + 62 ubu
‣ src:mksh (1 bug: 0 RC, 0 I&N, 1 M&W, 0 F&P)
dash has two RC bugs they just closed because they don’t care about quality…
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
