[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230620105119.0090dc45@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:51:19 +0200
From: Jₑₙₛ Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
To: "罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)" <luoyonggang@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] c2y: Add monotonic timed wait support for threads
mtx cnd
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:53:42 +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
> I'd like to receive some feedback of the function names
> mtx_timedlock_monotonic
> cnd_timedwait_monotonic
I find such interfaces too specific.
> is properly as a proposal for c2y(the next standard after c23).
I'd much prefer an interface that just adds the time base as a
parameter, similar to `pthread_cond_clockdwait` or so, perhaps named
`cnd_timedwait_base`.
That would be much easier to standardize. Just take an existing POSIX
interface, adapt from POSIX clocks to time bases, use a name that fits
into the C naming scheme, and copy over and adapt the description.
Thanks
Jₑₙₛ
--
:: ICube :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: deputy director ::
:: Université de Strasbourg :::::::::::::::::::::: ICPS ::
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :::::::::::::::::::::::: Camus ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ☎ +33 368854536 ::
:: https://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
