[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230601182223.GZ3630668@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 20:22:23 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: Jₑₙₛ Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: High-level C23 process requests
* Jₑₙₛ Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr> [2023-06-01 08:58:42 +0200]:
> Also, in the compiler community there does not seem to be much of a
> resistance to implement C23. clang and gcc are almost complete and
> probably will have all of C23 the day it will be officially
> published. They will then probably switch to C23 as a default one or
> two versions later, once the C library support is stable.
well clang had _BitInt before it was in the standard.. which is a bit
of a problem because ppl only now realize that its abi is not what they
want so various targets try to retroactively specify the ps abi for it
which may leave existing clang broken.
in any case i think standard conformance is a good thing in musl, but
we are not in a big hurry to implement c23, and can wait until clang
and gcc converge on abi for a couple of targets.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
