[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJgzZoq7LNyhmjU+zHxnZjCcikaD_WPJpSn8V=U+oqwMeE+YGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:44:56 -0800
From: enh <enh@...gle.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SA_RESTORER for rv64?
oops, never actually sent the patch. attached...
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:31 AM Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:19 AM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 07:44:23AM -0800, enh wrote:
> > > arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for SA_RESTORER since
> > > the initial commit, but i think that's just copy & paste from whichever
> > > architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the linux kernel itself
> > > doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm missing something?
> >
> > I suspect this is just a mistake. Have you seen any ill effects from
> > it? If riscv folks can confirm it's wrong, I'll remove it.
>
> Yeah I think it should be removed. Perhaps mips is in same boat.
>
> >
> > Rich
View attachment "0001-risc-v-does-not-have-SA_RESTORER.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (795 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
