[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0737A458-7E17-4C2C-B702-7A40FAA6151A@adelielinux.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:20:34 -0600
From: "A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Prefer monotonic clock for DNS lookup timeouts
On Dec 1, 2022, at 9:11 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
>> http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/network/res_msend.c#n28
>>
>> Is this a bug or intentional?
>
> It was intentional, based on a belief that the monotonic clock might
> not be present on all kernels. That seems to be incorrect for the
> range of versions we "support" (>=2.6.0) but some archs unofficially
> work back to mid 2.4.x or earlier with limited functionality (no
> threads). Note for example that clock_gettime has fallback to the
> gettimeofday syscall despite all kernels >=2.6.0 having clock_gettime
> (though was it perhaps gated under some CONFIG_ for "realtime
> features" at some point? this probably calls for some research...)
>
> Switching to monotonic here has been on my radar for a while. I see
> two decent ways to do it without any possibility of regression:
>
> 1. Have the above mtime() function fall back to CLOCK_REALTIME on
> ENOSYS, or
>
> 2. Go through with integrating a fallback for CLOCK_MONOTONIC I've had
> in draft for a long time that works on ancient kernels. It works by
> combining the seconds-resolution time from SYS_sysinfo uptime with
> the finer-grained-but-wrapping jiffy count from SYS_times too get a
> monotonic jiffies-resolution uptime.
>
> The latter is cute/fun but a little bit of work to get right and I'm
> not sure it's sufficiently useful to justify doing it. Option 1 seems
> very reasonable.
>
> Rich
clock_gettime was added in 2.5.63 and 2.6.0 and was always obj-y.
There is no CONFIG knob that controls it in early 2.6, though I stopped
my search at 2.6.16.
I have written this patch out, but I don’t have a box without monotonic
clock, so I can’t test the validity of the patch. I will send the patch
to the list for review.
Best,
-A.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
