|
Message-ID: <20220819171016.GI7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:10:17 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: NRK <nrk@...root.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: canonicalize_file_name(3) On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:48:33PM +0600, NRK wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:30:10PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > It relies on a glibc extension to realpath(3) > > What extension are we talking about exactly? > Because `man canonicalize_file_name` states the following: > > | The call canonicalize_file_name(path) is equivalent to the call: > | realpath(path, NULL); > > Calling realpath with NULL as the 2nd parameter is well defined since > POSIX-2008 [0], if that's what you were talking about. > > [0]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/realpath.html This. To further elaborate, we generally don't add nonstandard functions when there is a fully portable (or even just "at least as portable as the extension" i.e. "works everywhere the extension would have worked") way to do exactly the same thing that takes no effort for the affected software to fix and do right. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.