Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220329155453.GF7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:54:53 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Harald Hoyer <harald@...fian.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] feat(x86_64): use wrfsbase if AT_HWCAP2
 allows usage

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 02:24:16PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> If `AT_HWCAP2` has `HWCAP2_FSGSBASE` set, then instead of calling
> `arch_prctl()`, the `wrfsbase` instruction will be used.
> 
> This is helpful in SGX contexts, where inside the enclave no other
> mechanism is possible.

Thanks for including this motivation, since otherwise I don't think it
makes any sense to use this feature. BTW what happens with other
syscalls in such a context (at least set_tid_address is called
unconditionally), and how does the process communicate any information
or even exit?

> diff --git a/src/thread/x86_64/__set_thread_area.c b/src/thread/x86_64/__set_thread_area.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..dcc5d116
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/thread/x86_64/__set_thread_area.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#include <libc.h>
> +#include <syscall.h>
> +#include <bits/hwcap.h>
> +
> +hidden int __set_thread_area(void *p)
> +{
> +	if (__hwcap2 & HWCAP2_FSGSBASE) {
> +		__asm__ ("wrfsbase %0" :: "r" (p) : "memory");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	// arch_prctl(SET_FS, arg)
> +	return syscall(__NR_arch_prctl, 0x1002, p);
> +}

I'm guessing this breaks build on anything but recent assembler
versions, no? If so, it should probably be written with a .byte
directive or something.

There's also a question of whether the existence of the hwcap flag is
intended to document a contract for the kernel to permit the process
to perform this operation, and a contract for the kernel to accept it
being set this way (rather than creating a possible inconsistency
between the kernel's idea of the process's %fs base and the actual %fs
base that's active. Is this documented somewhere on the kernel side?
If so then this should be okay, but this needs checking before it can
be merged.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.