|
Message-ID: <CAKrOiPT-nen+_A_qxeK98LR+6oHG8dqY5riT+YFUjLxKH1daiQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 05:10:13 +0000 From: naruto canada <narutocanada@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Big thanks to musl developers. On 3/1/22, Rodolfo Câmara Villordo <rodolfovillordo@...il.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the noob question. Why compiling the libc with -O0 is "a thing" > to you? I can only imagine reasons surrounding security research, is that > your use case? Nothing to do with my job or anything of the sort. It is just a hobiit, I have been compiling and maintain my own linux stuff for as long as the site LFS started (about 22 years). With gcc-2.7.x and libc5, you can compile the whole distro in an hour, Nowadays, it take me 24 hours on a 4 cores machine. I can't remember exactly which version of glibc or linux started requiring -O2 So I ended compiling the whole thing in -O2, otherwise they would simply refuse to compile. It is still the same with the linux kernel. (I've just tried it) Just to be rebelious and fun, I manage to compile the whole thing except the kernel and bootloader (syslinux still requires at least -O1). Anyway, Thanks for listening to a old man's ramblings. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 04:29 naruto canada <narutocanada@...il.com> wrote: > >> hi >> >> Big thanks to musl developers. You guys have done a good job. >> I've managed to port most of my desktop over to musl. >> It is currently compiling itself within qemu :) >> on x86_64 real machine :) >> Once qemu is ported, the other targets are much easier. >> It takes surprising little effort to port most packages. >> It took me only about a week. Very little changes was needed. >> I was only forced to upgrade a few packages. >> The first time in 22 years, >> that I was able to compile libc with -O0 and not -O2 :) >> Thanks. >> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.