|
Message-ID: <CAGt4E5uWxCvB-+jN=3xFr8=TPuVEL7nwPdcveakf3QUXdjspoA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:23:54 -0800 From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com> To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Subject: Re: git cloning over https? On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 14:12, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote: > > > > On 1/13/2022 1:53 PM, Alyssa Ross wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 01:44:23PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Would you consider allowing git.musl-libc.org to serve the repositories over > >> https rather than git? For some obscure reasons some corporate environments > >> do block the git protocol whereas https goes through. > > > > You should be able to git clone https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl. > > It is quite slow though -- since it looks like cgit is serving, this > > is presumably because cgit's built-in git serving feature only supports > > the legacy ("dumb") HTTP program, not the fast ("smart") one used by > > git http-backend, which would be a nice infrastructure improvement. > > I don't seem to be able to get cloning from cgit to work either and not > doing this in the corporate environment I vaguely mentioned but over my > home residential provider (Cox). git:// works. Interestingly, it worked for me. Kind of. It is *extremely* slow. It took about 15 minutes to clone the repo, which isn't big at all and should take no more than a minute to transfer (likely a lot less). Interestingly, the local clone created via cgit and https is 52 MB in size while a clone via the git:// protocol is only 20 MB. Something "interesting" seems to be happening when cloning via cgit. The repo does seem to be fully functional, though. Regards, -Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.