|
Message-ID: <256fa366-6e6b-8248-3176-1736c8db55a4@unboiled.info> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:25:11 +0100 From: Alexander Sosedkin <monk@...oiled.info> To: Érico Nogueira <ericonr@...root.org>, musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: $ORIGIN rpath expansion without /proc: code looks wrong On 11/17/21 18:00, Érico Nogueira wrote: > On Wed Nov 17, 2021 at 11:04 AM -03, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: >> Hello, I've encountered a case of a binary with an rpath of >> /some/meaningful/lib:$ORIGIN/../lib >> not starting up due to not finding /some/meaningful/lib/libxyz.so. >> ldd'ing said it's there though. >> And the library was found alright when I patchelf'd rpath to just >> /some/meaningful/lib >> >> I dug into musl code and came across that bit that checks /proc. >> Sure enough, when I tried mounting /proc, it started working fine. >> Yet the error handling from accessing /proc puzzles me: >> >> ldso/dynlink.c, fixup_rpath(): >> l = readlink("/proc/self/exe", buf, buf_size); >> if (l == -1) switch (errno) { >> case ENOENT: >> case ENOTDIR: >> case EACCES: >> break; >> default: >> return -1; >> } >> if (l >= buf_size) >> return 0; >> buf[l] = 0; >> origin = buf; >> >> hitting that break like I had means zeroing buf[-1], right? > > No. Because `l` is size_t (unsigned long), it's the biggest possible > value for size_t, and `l >= buf_size` will be true, Oh! Thanks a lot, that's what confused me. Sorry for the noise then. > which means the > function returns 0. This conditional also catches the case where > truncation happens in readlink(3). > Documenting this in a comment or changing `break;` for `return 0;` might > make sense, though. Yeah, I'd say a `return 0;` there would've been easier to comprehend. I don't think there's much need for a comment... >> Could somebody take a look at this and double-check that >> this codepath makes sense? > > It does, but it might not be as robust as you wish. fixup_rpath() treats > the RPATH entry as a single string, and does all $ORIGIN substitutions > in one go (what splits the string by ":" is open_path()). This means > that the entire RPATH entry containing $ORIGIN will be ignored if > /proc/self/exe can't be accessed, despite one or more of them not > depending on $ORIGIN. ... because if running /proc-less isn't supported in general, then such separate expansions are probably not worth the effort. And it's far from being the only mention of /proc in the code, so I'm going to presume it's not. >> My attempts at comprehending it fail irrecoverably at this line. >> >> (CC me on replies, please. >> No nice context to provide, building my own toolchain at >> https://github.com/t184256/bootstrap-from-tcc) Thanks for the answer, appreciated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.