Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXx5Ncu7Of5bsfCM@darth.lan>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:44:05 +0200
From: Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml@....net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
Cc: Érico Nogueira <ericonr@...root.org>
Subject: Re: Re: freeswitch and musl 1.2.x (time64 most likely)

Am Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:04:45PM +0200 schrieb Szabolcs Nagy:
> * Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml@....net> [2021-10-29 16:40:02 +0200]:
> > (gdb) p current
> > $1 = 193277741781
> > (gdb) p &current
> > $2 = (apr_time_t *) 0x7fffac90
> > (gdb) p os_now
> > $3 = 19521141760827868
> > (gdb) p &os_now
> > $4 = (time_t *) 0x7fffac88
> > (gdb) p timediff
> > $5 = 19521141756395521
>
> these values are completely wrong (may be not set up yet,
> you cannot rely on line numbers in optimized code)
>
> time on your system now should be around
>
> 1635500000
>
> current / 1000000 is
>
> 193277
>
> which is 1970-01-03 05:41:17
>
> os_now is far in the future.
>

Hello Szabolcs,

I changed the test program a little bit:

--- a/test/testtime.c
+++ b/test/testtime.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include "testutil.h"
 #include "apr_strings.h"
 #include <time.h>
+#include <stdio.h>

 #define STR_SIZE 45

@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ static void test_now(abts_case *tc, void
     apr_time_t timediff;
     apr_time_t current;
     time_t os_now;
+    struct tm * timeinfo;

     current = apr_time_now();
     time(&os_now);
@@ -66,6 +68,10 @@ static void test_now(abts_case *tc, void
      * that the time will be slightly off, so accept anything between -1 and
      * 1 second.
      */
+    timeinfo = localtime ( &os_now );
+    printf ( "Current local time and date: %s - %lld seconds since epoch\n", asctime (timeinfo), os_now);
+    timeinfo = localtime ( &current );
+    printf ( "Current APR time and date: %s - %lld seconds since epoch\n", asctime (timeinfo), current);
     ABTS_ASSERT(tc, "apr_time and OS time do not agree",
              (timediff > -2) && (timediff < 2));
 }

The output is:

Current local time and date: Sat Oct 30 00:25:11 2021 - 7024617916842658549 seconds since epoch
Current APR time and date: Mon Jan  5 10:46:45 1970 - 1635546302107561 seconds since epoch
|Line 76: apr_time and OS time do not agree

(gdb) b time
Breakpoint 1 at 0x77fd0b08: file compat/time32/time32.c, line 7.
(gdb) b gettimeofday
Breakpoint 2 at 0x77fcff6c: file compat/time32/gettimeofday_time32.c, line 7.
(gdb) b apr_time_now
Function "apr_time_now" not defined.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
Breakpoint 3 (apr_time_now) pending.
(gdb) c
Continuing.

Breakpoint 1, time (p=0x7fffac90) at compat/time32/time32.c:7
7	{
(gdb) next
8		time_t t = time(0);
(gdb)
9		if (t < INT32_MIN || t > INT32_MAX) {
(gdb)
13		if (p) *p = t;
(gdb)
14		return t;
(gdb)
test_now (tc=0x7fffacd0, data=0x0) at testtime.c:66
66	    timediff = os_now - (current / APR_USEC_PER_SEC);
(gdb) p os_now
$1 = 7024617916842658549
(gdb) p current
$2 = 1635546302107561
(gdb) p APR_USEC_PER_SEC
$3 = 1000000
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[Inferior 1 (process 15506) exited with code 01]

So OS time is correct. Something not working right with apr.

> > (gdb) p &timediff
> > $6 = (apr_time_t *) 0x7fffac98
> > (gdb) p time
> > $7 = {time32_t (time32_t *)} 0x77fd0b08 <time>
> > (gdb) p &time
> > $8 = (time32_t (*)(time32_t *)) 0x77fd0b08 <time>
> > (gdb) c
> > Continuing.
> > [Inferior 1 (process 14739) exited with code 01]
> > (gdb)
> >
> > To me it looks like apr is also using a 64 bit type for time. So it's a
> > bit of a surprise for me that there is a problem. I find it also strange
> > that the time function (which seems to be from libc) seems to be related
> > to a 32 bit type.
> >
> > Can you maybe make sense of this?
>
> you need to debug this further, all sorts of things may be wrong here.
>
> i'd remove all other tests from the test exe and break on gettimeofday
> and time and see what the libc returns, also print the time in the test.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.