[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPxz1+aQZkrUmwCGZVJmp2Hst+_xbFC9N+S0WxGnZ2QVt1WwgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:16:45 -0700
From: Parke <parke.nexus@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Newbie problem with musl-gcc
Nat! wrote:
> > > musl-gcc -o foo foo.c
> Am 08.10.21 um 08:31 schrieb Markus Wichmann:
> > This doesn't say -static in there. Try adding that and see was happens.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM Nat! <nat@...le-kybernetik.com> wrote:
> Nice, now it works.
> > musl-gcc essentially just adds a different specs file to GCC, and that
> > file is not changed based on the choice to have the shared library or
> > not.
> But why not ? It would make sense, wouldn't it ?
I believe the desired default, even with musl, is to use dynamic libraries.
So, IMO, the current behavior is expected and desired.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
