[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1i2kid6.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 09:39:33 -0300
From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@...ii.art.br>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, libc-dev@...ts.llvm.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Linux powerpc new system call instruction and ABI
Nicholas Piggin via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org> writes:
> As a more hacky thing you could make a syscall with -1 and see how
> the error looks, and then assume all syscalls will be the same.
I'm not sure this would work.
Even in glibc, it's expected that early syscalls will use sc while scv is used
later in the execution.
--
Tulio Magno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
