[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25ec54b9.3ddd.1797a0cf8b6.Coremail.zhaixiaojuan@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 19:19:01 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: 翟小娟 <zhaixiaojuan@...ngson.cn>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: 陈国祺 <chenguoqi@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Port the new architecture loongarch64 to
musl
The reason for the implementation in assembly is because I am familiar with assembly myself. I think this shows the implementation logic and final purpose of the function more clearly than the implementation in C language.
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Ariadne Conill" <ariadne@...eferenced.org>
> 发送时间: 2021-05-13 03:53:01 (星期四)
> 收件人: musl@...ts.openwall.com
> 抄送: "陈国祺" <chenguoqi@...ngson.cn>
> 主题: Re: Re: Re: [musl] Port the new architecture loongarch64 to musl
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 12 May 2021, 翟小娟 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > We have ported the code of libucontext for loongarch64 architecture and can be obtained from https://github.com/loongson-community/libucontext
> > Currently qemu is still being tested, I will announce it as soon as it is completed.
>
> It looks alright, but I am wondering why makecontext is written in
> assembly. The reason why it is written in assembly for mips had to do
> with specific peculariaties of how the MIPS64 ABI interacted with
> libucontext. I don't see that the loongarch64 code is trying to capture
> the $gp register though.
>
> Ariadne
</chenguoqi@...ngson.cn></ariadne@...eferenced.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
