|
Message-ID: <9e0ddc62-683c-6847-0c75-d601d5048a36@disroot.org> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:38:51 -0300 From: Érico Nogueira <ericonr@...root.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Announcing an argp-standalone fork I accidentally didn't reply to the list. Em 10/02/2021 22:01, Ismael Luceno escreveu: > On 10/Feb/2021 20:36, Érico Nogueira wrote: >> Hi! >> >> So, the current argp-standalone version used by at least Void, Alpine >> and possibly FreeBSD (though I don't know the best way to contact >> them) has a few tiny issues here and there. The one I experienced was >> that unning elfutils' `eu-elfclassify --help` resulted in a segfault. >> >> Since argp-standalone upstream has been inactive for a long time, and >> I couldn't find any other forks, I decided to do it myself, and try to >> bring it in line with what glibc currently has. >> >> >> >> The results are in https://github.com/ericonr/argp-standalone >> >> if anyone else wants to try it / verify my work. I also imported quite >> a few trivial and stylistic glibc changes in order to keep the diff >> with future glibc as small as possible, which should make updating the >> library reasonably simple. >> >> There is still this FreeBSD patch that I haven't imported: >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/argp-standalone/files/patch-argp-help.c?view=log >> >> I should be switching Void to this fork in the short term, as well. >> >> Cheers, and hope this can be useful for someone, >> Érico > > Have you seen <https://github.com/xhebox/libuargp>? > No, I wasn't aware of it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Before commiting to my version, I will try and compare them. Since most distros are still using the old argp-standalone, from what I can see in repology.org, I hope we can try and improve the situation some... Cheers, Érico
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.