[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SYBP282MB020251816B33C715D27F51A18AB79@SYBP282MB0202.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:29:19 +0000
From: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
CC: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Can’t build musl with lto=thin
I tried to run “musl-clang -Oz -flto -s -static -fuse-ld=musl-clang-lld -Wl,—plugin-opt=O3,-O3 hello.c”, but it still doesn’t work.
Note that I have removed -static from ld.musl-clang-lld
Jiahao XU
________________________________
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 8:01:06 AM
To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 05:32:45AM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> I used `musl-clang -Oz -flto -s -fuse-ld=musl-clang-lld-static -Wl,—plugin-opt=O3,-O3 hello.c` to produce the executable.
Where is -static? Normally it does *not* work to add -static just to
the ld command line. The compiler driver has to know that it's
requesting static linking because it will pass a different command
line to the linker based on that.
> Content of `/usr/local/musl/bin/ld.musl-clang-lld-static` is same as
> the generated `ld.musl-clang`, except for the last line, which I
> modified it to:
>
> exec $($cc -print-prog-name=ld.lld) -nostdlib “$@“ -static -lc -dynamic-linker “$ldso”
Try moving -static out from here (i.e. using the script unmodified
except for requesting ld.lld) and see if that works. Note that a
correctly linked executable will not have any INTERP in readelf -a
output, so as long as you see INTERP anywhere there you're doing
something wrong.
Rich
> ________________________________
> From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 4:01:22 PM
> To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
> Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:44:48PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> > (gdb) bt
> >
> > #0 0x00007ffff7ff5498 in decode_vec () from /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1
> >
> > #1 0x00007ffff7ff58cb in decode_dyn () from /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1
> >
> > #2 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>
> This is not a static-linked program. decode_dyn is part of the dynamic
> linker. It looks to me like you've created some sort of weird hybrid
> executable that's not valid. Can you show the command lines you used
> to produce it?
>
> Also please keep list on CC when replying.
>
> Rich
>
>
> > (gdb) info r
> >
> > rax 0x1 1
> >
> > rbx 0x7ffff7ffe2d8 140737354130136
> >
> > rcx 0x5000 20480
> >
> > rdx 0x200238 2097720
> >
> > rsi 0x7fffffffd8d0 140737488345296
> >
> > rdi 0x0 0
> >
> > rbp 0x7ffff7ffe2d8 0x7ffff7ffe2d8 <__dls3.app>
> >
> > rsp 0x7fffffffd8c8 0x7fffffffd8c8
> >
> > r8 0x0 0
> >
> > r9 0xfffffffffffff000 -4096
> >
> > r10 0x800000 8388608
> >
> > r11 0x200000 2097152
> >
> > r12 0x7fffffffdcb8 140737488346296
> >
> > r13 0x0 0
> >
> > r14 0x7fffffffd8d0 140737488345296
> >
> > r15 0x7fffffffdcb8 140737488346296
> >
> > rip 0x7ffff7ff5498 0x7ffff7ff5498 <decode_vec+21>
> >
> > eflags 0x10246 [ PF ZF IF RF ]
> >
> > cs 0x33 51
> >
> > ss 0x2b 43
> >
> > ds 0x0 0
> >
> > es 0x0 0
> >
> > fs 0x0 0
> >
> > gs 0x0 0
> >
> >
> > Disassembly of decode_dyn:
> >
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58af <+0>: push %r14
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58b1 <+2>: push %rbx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58b2 <+3>: sub $0x108,%rsp
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58b9 <+10>: mov %rdi,%rbx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58bc <+13>: mov 0x10(%rdi),%rdi
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58c0 <+17>: mov %rsp,%r14
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58c3 <+20>: mov %r14,%rsi
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58c6 <+23>: call 0x7ffff7ff5483 <decode_vec>
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff58cb <+28>: mov (%rbx),%rax
> >
> >
> > Disassembly of decode_vec:
> >
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5483 <+0>: xor %eax,%eax
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5485 <+2>: cmp $0x20,%rax
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5489 <+6>: je 0x7ffff7ff5495 <decode_vec+18>
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff548b <+8>: andq $0x0,(%rsi,%rax,8)
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5490 <+13>: inc %rax
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5493 <+16>: jmp 0x7ffff7ff5485 <decode_vec+2>
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5495 <+18>: push $0x1
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff5497 <+20>: pop %rax
> >
> > => 0x00007ffff7ff5498 <+21>: mov (%rdi),%rcx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff549b <+24>: test %rcx,%rcx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff549e <+27>: je 0x7ffff7ff54c3 <decode_vec+64>
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54a0 <+29>: lea -0x1(%rcx),%rdx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54a4 <+33>: cmp $0x1e,%rdx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54a8 <+37>: ja 0x7ffff7ff54bd <decode_vec+58>
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54aa <+39>: shlx %rcx,%rax,%rcx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54af <+44>: or %rcx,(%rsi)
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54b2 <+47>: mov (%rdi),%rcx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54b5 <+50>: mov 0x8(%rdi),%rdx
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54b9 <+54>: mov %rdx,(%rsi,%rcx,8)
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54bd <+58>: add $0x10,%rdi
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54c1 <+62>: jmp 0x7ffff7ff5498 <decode_vec+21>
> >
> > 0x00007ffff7ff54c3 <+64>: ret
> >
> >
> > Jiahao XU
> >
> > Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 10:30:12 AM
> > To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
> > Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
> > Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:04:32PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> > > > So something like (in config.mak):
> > > >
> > > > obj/ldso/dlstart.lo: CFLAGS_ALL += -fno-lto
> > >
> > > Thanks, with this I was able to build libc.so successfully with clang and created a 3.5 KB hello world program using clang and lld.
> > >
> > > However, I still wasn’t able to statically linked with libc.
> > >
> > > Once I added ‘-static’ to the compiler flags, the executable failed with ‘Segmentation fault (core dumped)’.
> >
> > It's libc.a, not libc.so, that will be involved in making a
> > static-linked binary. It's hard to know what's going wrong without
> > more information. Can you run under a debugger and provide a
> > backtrace, disassembly, and register dump for where the crash occurs?
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 7:12:31 AM
> > > To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
> > > Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:19:42PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> > > > musl-1.2.2 compilation with clang-11 failed to build libc.so at the final linking stage:
> > > >
> > > > ld.lld: error: undefined hidden symbol: __dls2
> > > > >>> referenced by ld-temp.o
> > > > >>> lto.tmp:(_dlstart_c)
> > > > >>> did you mean: __dls3
> > > > >>> defined in: lto.tmp
> > > >
> > > > I am using CFLAGS=‘-march=native -mtune=native -Oz -flto
> > > > -fmerge-all-constants -fomit-frame-pointer’ and LDFLAGS=‘-flto
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > The -fmerge-all-constants option gives non-conforming language
> > > semantics and should not be used, but that's a separate issue.
> > >
> > > > -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,—plugin-opt=O3,-O3,—icf=safe’.
> > >
> > > > No configure option is supplied.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, it's a known issue that LTO misses references from asm
> > > (both top-level and in functions). I think dlstart.lo and a few other
> > > files should just be built with LTO disabled; any LTO-type
> > > optimization in code that runs at this stage is inherently invalid,
> > > anyway. So something like (in config.mak):
> > >
> > > obj/ldso/dlstart.lo: CFLAGS_ALL += -fno-lto
> > >
> > > Rich
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
