Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <SYBP282MB02026BB49DD8C867CB787E8A8AB79@SYBP282MB0202.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:32:45 +0000
From: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
CC: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Can’t build musl with lto=thin

I used `musl-clang -Oz -flto -s -fuse-ld=musl-clang-lld-static -Wl,—plugin-opt=O3,-O3 hello.c` to produce the executable.

Content of `/usr/local/musl/bin/ld.musl-clang-lld-static` is same as the generated `ld.musl-clang`, except for the last line, which I modified it to:

    exec $($cc -print-prog-name=ld.lld) -nostdlib “$@“ -static -lc -dynamic-linker “$ldso”

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 4:01:22 PM
To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:44:48PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> (gdb) bt
>
> #0  0x00007ffff7ff5498 in decode_vec () from /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1
>
> #1  0x00007ffff7ff58cb in decode_dyn () from /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1
>
> #2  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

This is not a static-linked program. decode_dyn is part of the dynamic
linker. It looks to me like you've created some sort of weird hybrid
executable that's not valid. Can you show the command lines you used
to produce it?

Also please keep list on CC when replying.

Rich


> (gdb) info r
>
> rax            0x1                 1
>
> rbx            0x7ffff7ffe2d8      140737354130136
>
> rcx            0x5000              20480
>
> rdx            0x200238            2097720
>
> rsi            0x7fffffffd8d0      140737488345296
>
> rdi            0x0                 0
>
> rbp            0x7ffff7ffe2d8      0x7ffff7ffe2d8 <__dls3.app>
>
> rsp            0x7fffffffd8c8      0x7fffffffd8c8
>
> r8             0x0                 0
>
> r9             0xfffffffffffff000  -4096
>
> r10            0x800000            8388608
>
> r11            0x200000            2097152
>
> r12            0x7fffffffdcb8      140737488346296
>
> r13            0x0                 0
>
> r14            0x7fffffffd8d0      140737488345296
>
> r15            0x7fffffffdcb8      140737488346296
>
> rip            0x7ffff7ff5498      0x7ffff7ff5498 <decode_vec+21>
>
> eflags         0x10246             [ PF ZF IF RF ]
>
> cs             0x33                51
>
> ss             0x2b                43
>
> ds             0x0                 0
>
> es             0x0                 0
>
> fs             0x0                 0
>
> gs             0x0                 0
>
>
> Disassembly of decode_dyn:
>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58af <+0>:     push   %r14
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58b1 <+2>:     push   %rbx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58b2 <+3>:     sub    $0x108,%rsp
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58b9 <+10>:    mov    %rdi,%rbx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58bc <+13>:    mov    0x10(%rdi),%rdi
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58c0 <+17>:    mov    %rsp,%r14
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58c3 <+20>:    mov    %r14,%rsi
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58c6 <+23>:    call   0x7ffff7ff5483 <decode_vec>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff58cb <+28>:    mov    (%rbx),%rax
>
>
> Disassembly of decode_vec:
>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5483 <+0>:     xor    %eax,%eax
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5485 <+2>:     cmp    $0x20,%rax
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5489 <+6>:     je     0x7ffff7ff5495 <decode_vec+18>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff548b <+8>:     andq   $0x0,(%rsi,%rax,8)
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5490 <+13>:    inc    %rax
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5493 <+16>:    jmp    0x7ffff7ff5485 <decode_vec+2>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5495 <+18>:    push   $0x1
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff5497 <+20>:    pop    %rax
>
> => 0x00007ffff7ff5498 <+21>:    mov    (%rdi),%rcx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff549b <+24>:    test   %rcx,%rcx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff549e <+27>:    je     0x7ffff7ff54c3 <decode_vec+64>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54a0 <+29>:    lea    -0x1(%rcx),%rdx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54a4 <+33>:    cmp    $0x1e,%rdx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54a8 <+37>:    ja     0x7ffff7ff54bd <decode_vec+58>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54aa <+39>:    shlx   %rcx,%rax,%rcx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54af <+44>:    or     %rcx,(%rsi)
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54b2 <+47>:    mov    (%rdi),%rcx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54b5 <+50>:    mov    0x8(%rdi),%rdx
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54b9 <+54>:    mov    %rdx,(%rsi,%rcx,8)
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54bd <+58>:    add    $0x10,%rdi
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54c1 <+62>:    jmp    0x7ffff7ff5498 <decode_vec+21>
>
>    0x00007ffff7ff54c3 <+64>:    ret
>
>
> Jiahao XU
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ________________________________
> From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 10:30:12 AM
> To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
> Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:04:32PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> > > So something like (in config.mak):
> > >
> > > obj/ldso/dlstart.lo: CFLAGS_ALL += -fno-lto
> >
> > Thanks, with this I was able to build libc.so successfully with clang and created a 3.5 KB hello world program using clang and lld.
> >
> > However, I still wasn’t able to statically linked with libc.
> >
> > Once I added ‘-static’ to the compiler flags, the executable failed with ‘Segmentation fault (core dumped)’.
>
> It's libc.a, not libc.so, that will be involved in making a
> static-linked binary. It's hard to know what's going wrong without
> more information. Can you run under a debugger and provide a
> backtrace, disassembly, and register dump for where the crash occurs?
>
> Rich
>
>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 7:12:31 AM
> > To: Jiahao XU <Jiahao_XU@...look.com>
> > Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
> > Subject: Re: [musl] Can’t build musl with lto=thin
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:19:42PM +0000, Jiahao XU wrote:
> > > musl-1.2.2 compilation with clang-11 failed to build libc.so at the final linking stage:
> > >
> > >     ld.lld: error: undefined hidden symbol: __dls2
> > >     >>> referenced by ld-temp.o
> > >     >>>                          lto.tmp:(_dlstart_c)
> > >     >>> did you mean: __dls3
> > >     >>> defined in: lto.tmp
> > >
> > > I am using CFLAGS=‘-march=native -mtune=native -Oz -flto
> > > -fmerge-all-constants -fomit-frame-pointer’ and LDFLAGS=‘-flto
> >   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > The -fmerge-all-constants option gives non-conforming language
> > semantics and should not be used, but that's a separate issue.
> >
> > > -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,—plugin-opt=O3,-O3,—icf=safe’.
> >
> > > No configure option is supplied.
> >
> > Otherwise, it's a known issue that LTO misses references from asm
> > (both top-level and in functions). I think dlstart.lo and a few other
> > files should just be built with LTO disabled; any LTO-type
> > optimization in code that runs at this stage is inherently invalid,
> > anyway. So something like (in config.mak):
> >
> > obj/ldso/dlstart.lo: CFLAGS_ALL += -fno-lto
> >
> > Rich

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.