[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5298816.XTEcGr0bgB@nanabozho>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:31:54 -0600
From: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@...eferenced.org>
To: Milan P. Stanić <mps@...anta.net>, musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MT fork
Hello,
On Friday, October 30, 2020 12:57:17 PM MDT Rich Felker wrote:
> There was a regression in musl too, I think. With
> 27b2fc9d6db956359727a66c262f1e69995660aa you should be able to
> re-enable parallel mark. If you get a chance to test, let us know if
> it works for you.
I have pushed current musl git plus the MT fork patch to Alpine edge as Alpine
musl 1.2.2_pre0, and reenabling parallel mark has worked fine.
It would be nice to have a musl 1.2.2 release that I can use for the source
tarball instead of a git snapshot, but this will do for now.
Ariadne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
