Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69fc8640a4ec2d22fdf3e6526c5f0040e42b524a.camel@klomp.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:04:44 +0100
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@...mp.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: elfutils-devel@...rceware.org, musl@...ts.openwall.com, 
	Érico Rolim
	 <erico.erc@...il.com>, Max Rees <maxcrees@...com>
Subject: Re: Re: [QUESTION] Which fnmatch() functionality does
 elfutils depend on?

On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 10:19 +0100, Florian Weimer via Elfutils-devel
wrote:
> * Rich Felker:
> 
> > As I stated in my other reply, I'm opposed to that because it does not
> > admit implementation with the same (very desirable) big-O properties,
> > and the "extmatch" syntax is not widely known or widely used.
> 
> The syntax comes from ksh and is used in shell scripts.  (bash requires
> the extglob option to enable it, which makes it easy to search for
> instances.)

Right, it is also adopted by zsh and some other shells. The big-O
properties don't really matter in this case because fnmatch is used on
small input strings like file names (or in this case section names).

Cheers,

Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.