[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ86T=VabfSDvNRnVtJvPB_7m2fVEr0F1PPoL5FmHtxQtCMqnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:43:42 -0700
From: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Release prep for 1.2.1, and afterwards
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:50 PM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> As noted in the past I'd like to get rid of having high level flow
> logic in the arch asm and instead have the arch provide string asm
> fragments, if desired, to copy blocks, which could then be used in a
> shared C skeleton. However as you noted this has been a point of
> practical performance problem for a long time and I don't think it's
> fair to just keep putting it off for a better solution.
I'd like to see the patches to enable asm memcpy for big endian ARM
merged. I may be the only user of musl on big endian ARM though (?) so
not sure how much wider interest there is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
