|
|
Message-ID: <96367f9c-4b02-c512-9d46-96de9e39a059@bell-sw.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 20:26:51 +0300
From: Alexander Scherbatiy <alexander.scherbatiy@...l-sw.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Markus Wichmann <nullplan@....net>
Subject: Re: Shared library loading
On 22.05.2020 21:25, Rich Felker wrote:
> The concept here is that non-pathname library names should be loaded
> from the library path and not replaced by something (typically a
> "module" or "plug-in") in a different, explicitly-loaded location that
> happens to have a colliding base filename.
>
> For example suppose your application loads modules from $libdir/myapp/
> and has a module named "libfoo.so". Unbeknownst to you, there's also a
> "libfoo.so" in the system paths, and some library you potentially load
> indirectly (maybe the GPU driver for some video hardware you've never
> heard of) depends on "libfoo.so".
>
> If dlopen("$libdir/myapp/libfoo.so") had put "libfoo.so" in the
> namespace such that it would satisfy future load requests for the name
> "libfoo.so", the subsequent load would break due to getting the wrong
> (unrelated) library.
Is it correct that RTLD_GLOBAL flag is in some kind of obsolete in
musl because calling
dlopen("$libdir/myapp/libfoo.so", RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL);
dlopen("$libdir2/myapp2/libbar.so", RTLD_LAZY);
does not allow libbar.so to find library $libdir/myapp/libfoo.so
which it is depend on?
What is the suggested way in musl to load $libdir/myapp/libfoo.so
from a custom directory so libbar.so can find it?
Thanks,
Alexander.
> Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.