[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87imi32xj1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:52:34 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: Christian <list-christian@....de>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Resolver routines, Postfix DNSSEC troubles - how to check for incompatibilities?
* Christian:
> So Viktor did some digging:
>
> "The comment on line 25:
>
> https://github.com/runtimejs/musl-libc/blob/master/include/resolv.h#L25
>
> is not encouraging. It suggests that _res is unused. If so, Postfix
> DNS does not work correctly with this C library. And not just for DANE, since Postfix is also unable to to control RES_DEFNAMES and RES_DNSRCH.
Are these changes to the RES_DEFNAMES and RES_DNSRCH flags really
necessary? Why doesn't Postfix use res_query (or perhaps res_send) as
appropriate?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
