[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200409181824.GD13749@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:18:25 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Norbert Lange <nolange79@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sysconf implementing _SC_NPROCESSORS_(CONF|ONLN)
incorrectly
* Norbert Lange <nolange79@...il.com> [2020-04-09 12:29:20 +0200]:
> Hello,
>
> I ran into a bug with trace-cmd when compiled against musl.
> Turns out musl just returns the affinity mask in both cases.
>
> I know those functions are not standard, but the irony is that if they
> are implemented,
> then they prevent applications to use fallbacks.
>
> See the trace-cmd bugreport:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206817
i think there are open unanswered questions about the right
semantics it's not clear what user code may expect
https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2019/03/16/1
https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2019/03/19/1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
