[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200326144941.GB11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:49:41 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Subject: Re: Switch to 64-bit time_t breaks strace build
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:11:12PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi musl list,
>
> Commit 381433396 (switch all existing 32-bit archs to 64-bit time_t)
> changed the IPC_STAT value on 32-bit arches from 2 to 0x102. This break
> strace build time assertion of IPC_STAT value:
>
> In file included from ./static_assert.h:11,
> from xlat/msgctl_flags.h:4,
> from ipc_msgctl.c:32:
> xlat/msgctl_flags.h:22:1: error: static assertion failed: "IPC_STAT != 2"
> static_assert((IPC_STAT) == (2), "IPC_STAT != 2");
>
> I that a strace bug?
Yes, it's one of the things mentioned in the time64 release notes:
https://musl.libc.org/time64.html
The upstream bug is:
https://github.com/strace/strace/issues/116
and it's fixed in:
https://github.com/strace/strace/commit/ce2c968a614ae2a3cf2354620b3b8200f003e87c
There are also some other non-build-breaking bugs with decoding of
structs, such as:
https://github.com/strace/strace/issues/122
I suspect most if not all are fixed now but I haven't checked lately.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
