|
Message-ID: <CAHiT=DHgc1n2h6H3thFzrD1umseWspxo03QUydpunh7NnR4OxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:16:50 +0100
From: Reini Urban <reini.urban@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Advocating musl to the chromium OS developers
Brian Peregrine <peregrinebrian@...il.com> schrieb am Sa., 14. März 2020,
18:05:
> I started a thread at the Chromium OS google groups (called Chromium
> OS: compile using musl as default ):
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-os-dev/iiDRh42EmvE
>
> I think that it would benefit the Chromium OS, but they need to be
> convinced more and want more proof (see reply by Kevin).
More realistic for them would be to switch to their better internal Android
libc, written in C++. This is much more secure than glibc and musl and also
fast enough.
They also implemented zero-cost bounds checking C99 extensions.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.