[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2002241017150.17524@key0.esi.com.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:20:41 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Min and Max of 2 Floating Point numbers
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I don't think the new IEEE 754 version specifies the behavior of the
> fmax/fmin functions due to the way they implemented this change. Do
> you have a publicly accessible reference?
Silly me. Yes, fmax and fmin stay functionally the same.
>
> For ISO C, there is a different proposal here:
>
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2489.pdf>
>
> It preserves the existing behavior of fmax/fmin, as far as I can tell.
Yes it does. I got confused.
Apologies - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
