|
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2002080807590.3230@key0.esi.com.au> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:25:43 +1100 (AEDT) From: Damian McGuckin <damianm@....com.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Considering x86-64 fenv.s to C In considering an i386 architecture with XMM capability, there is an issue with fegetenv()/feholdexcept() and fesetenv()/feupdateenv(). There is no __mxcsr field in the fenv_t structure. So, there is no way to return the MXCSR using the first pair. Do I just bury any MXCSR exceptions into the __status_word? Regards - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.