[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k1583m8b.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:09:08 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] removing SYS_clock_gettime & SYS_gettimeofday
* Rich Felker:
> I think I'd like to go ahead with this patch, discussed in a previous
> thread. Does it look okay? Should I add any other syscalls that are
> absolutely not valid to use anymore (as opposed to the ones with
> optional timeouts, which I won't remove, because musl doesn't break
> valid code to catch bugs) to the list?
I think this change needs to be reflected in the UAPI headers in some
way, too.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
