|
Message-ID: <20190806121047.GT9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 08:10:47 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix risc64 user_regs_struct conflict with kernel header On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:51:14AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > Rename user_regs_struct following the example of s390 to avoid conflict > with the kernel asm/ptrace.h header. > --- > arch/riscv64/bits/user.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h > index bd0f0fc7027f..097c7ad6ce18 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h > +++ b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -struct user_regs_struct { > +struct _user_regs_struct { > unsigned long pc; > unsigned long ra; > unsigned long sp; > -- > 2.20.1 Does this agree with glibc naming? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.