|
Message-ID: <20190408122120.GR23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:21:20 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Profiling musl On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:15:04PM +0200, Pascal Felber wrote: > Dear all, > > Does anyone have experience with profiling musl? We are running into > performance issues (after modifying some of the musl code) and would > like to understand where the overheads come from, but profiling with > gprof does not work and we have issues with valgrind. Any help will > be greatly appreciated. I would use perf(1). Making gprof work has been a very low priority (and maybe non-starter if the stuff needed for support would be invasive) since its model inherently perturbs the performance properties of the code badly. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.